Daily Beast: Obama, Hillary Toying With “Civil War”; Over Gun Confiscation

Daily Beast: Obama, Hillary Toying With ‘Civil War’ Over Gun Confiscation


Skip to comments.

Daily Beast: Obama, Hillary Toying With ‘Civil War’ Over Gun Confiscation
Breitbart ^ | 11/02/15 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 11/03/2015 5:10:27 AM PST by Enlightened1

On November 2, The Daily Beast pointed to recent statements from President Obama and Hillary Clinton regarding the implementation of Australian-style gun confiscation and suggested “civil war could erupt on American soil if any administration actually tried to confiscate privately owned firearms.

The Daily Beast theoretically agreed that  confiscation on a massive scale may be the only way to solve American gun violence, but they pointed out that it was not realistic and suggested Hillary risks causing irreparable divisions by talking about confiscation then mocking gun owners as conspiracy theorists waiting for “black helicopters” to come take their guns away.

According to The Daily Beast, confiscation was workable in Australia because there was no Second Amendment and the government only had to take 650,000 guns. That is a far cry from the 50 million believed to be in Americans hands.

Yes, 350 million.

But even more important than the number of guns is the depth of American devotion to them. And The Daily Beast observes that it is this devotion this dedication to the philosophy and tradition underlying the right to keep and bear arms that turns the mere mention of confiscation into something that could literally rip the country apart.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: 350million; civilwar; confiscation; guns


 


FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson

TennesseeWatchman.com

 if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.
%d bloggers like this: