More Top Stories:

Hitler’s judges: Roland Freisler and his U.S. progeny

Hitler’s judges: Roland Freisler and his U.S. progeny

By Ellis Washington

“How many judges do you think resigned in the Third Reich? Three. Great respect, it seems to me, has to be given to people who resign rather than do something they think is morally wrong, in order to make a point.”

~Justice Anthony Kennedy

“Justice Kennedy is holding up the Nazis as exemplars for the current Supreme Court.”

~ Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX)
Different picture, same Fascism: Roland Freisler (center), president of the Volk Court (People’s Court), gives the Nazi salute at the trial of conspirators in the July 1944 plot to kill Hitler (Operation Valkyrie). Under Freisler’s leadership, the court condemned thousands of Germans to death. Berlin, Germany, 1944. – DIZ Muenchen GMBH, Sueddeutscher Verlag Bilderdienst [original picture on the right]

Prologue: Judge Roland Freisler’s protégés today

In a recent revelatory article published in befitting Halloween in its utter evil, Cruz: Justice Kennedy compares own ruling to Nazi Germany, Justice Anthony Kennedy, a so-called “conservative” jurist who was nominated in February 1988 by “Mr. Conservative” himself, President Ronald Reagan, made an interesting admission. Justice Kennedy said that Christians should resign from office like those who opposed Third Reich, if they don’t like certain Progressive policies like same-sex marriage, Obamacare, abortion, etc.

Now do you see why I refer to the Democrat Socialist Party as “Holocaust Democrats” and why I did a series of historical essays systematically equating the political policies of Nazi National Socialism with Wilson-FDR-LBJ-Obama Democrat Socialism?

In an ironic twist demonstrative of a Freudian slip, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s recent remarks in a town hall meeting in answering various questions posed to him by citizens chose to answer one question by essentially comparing the judiciary in modern America with that of Nazi Germany. Was Kennedy correct or historically accurate to compare the U.S. Supreme Court to Nazi Germany or more pointedly, to Hitler’s Nazi-controlled courts? I answer, absolutely and historically, Yes! Because both courts aggressively uses Socialism to push or force society (Glieshaltung) into an evolution atheist Weltanschauung (Nazi worldview).

Tragically, it was Justice Kennedy who last June gave the deciding vote in the U.S. Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage case, Obergefell v. Hodges 576 U.S. ____ (2015); a landmark case that questioned the legality of imprisoning Kentucky county Clerk Kim Davis, who was jailed for nearly a week by U.S. District Judge David Bunning after the Supreme Court’s marriage ruling when she refused Bunning’s order to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couple in violation of her Christian faith.

At the meeting, a young man took the microphone and asked the following of Kennedy:

You claim new insights into the nature of marriage require states to issue marriage licenses in accord with this alternative version of marriage. And I can understand a similar case, probably more attractive to those of us who think that rational norms guide the exercise of sexual autonomy like they do economic autonomy, which would be that new insights into the nature of human life require states to take steps to stop…

 if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.


Opinions posted on are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
%d bloggers like this: