More Top Stories:

Is the GOP Giving Up on Repealing Obamacare?

Editor’s Note:  The GOP only USES repeal of Obamacare when polls indicate they need it.  Anything that gives that much power to the federal government will not be surrendered by either establishment party without serious heat from We The People.

Some Republican senators are no longer committed to full repeal of Obamacare.

That’s the takeaway from recent statements made by GOP senators about the Medicaid expansion, and whether or not repealing it will be included in the partial Obamacare repeal the Senate votes on via reconciliation (which means they need only 51 senators to vote in favor of it).

“I am very concerned about the 160,000 people who had Medicaid expansion in my state. I have difficulty with that being included,” Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.V., told The Hill. Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., told The Hill, “I respect the decision of our legislature and our governor on Medicaid expansion.”

And one anonymous GOP senator told The Hill, “Repealing the Medicaid expansion is not going to be in there because it’s too problematic for many Republicans.”

This is a problem, because the Medicaid expansion is a crucial part of Obamacare. Of the 9.25 million Americans who gained health insurance in 2014, nearly 9 million of them gained it through Medicaid, according to research by The Heritage Foundation.

Essentially, much of the coverage gains through Obamacare can be attributed to people going on Medicaid. That’s not shocking, as Obamacare hugely expanded eligibility for Medicaid, making it available to anyone at 138 percent of federal poverty level or below. (A Supreme Court decision allowed states to decide whether they wanted to allow the Medicaid expansion; some have, and others haven’t.)

But Medicaid isn’t the panacea it’s been advertised as. According to a study released in December of last year from the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, being on Medicaid doesn’t mean you have ready access to health care.

From the study:

We found that slightly more than half of providers could not offer appointments to enrollees. Notably, 35 percent could not be found at the location listed by the plan, and another 8 percent were at the location but said that they were not participating in the plan. An additional 8 percent were not accepting new patients. Among the providers who offered appointments, the median wait time was 2 weeks. However, over a quarter had wait times of more than 1 month, and 10 percent had wait times longer than 2 months.

However, those lousy results don’t come cheap. “For Medicaid, cost and enrollment are expected to continue to grow, in particular due to the expansion of the program under the Affordable Care Act,” wrote Robert Moffit and Nina Owcharenko, both of The Heritage Foundation, in July. “By 2023, total Medicaid spending is projected to climb to $835 billion, and enrollment will near 80 million.”

Nor does the expansion necessarily benefit whom you’d expect. According to 2012 projections from the Urban Institute, 82 percent of those expected to be eligible for Medicaid under the 138 percent level were childless, while 52 percent were between the ages of 18 and 34.

Ultimately, repealing Obamacare without ending the Medicaid expansion means you’re leaving a very…

 if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.


Opinions posted on are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
%d bloggers like this: