A year ago, no one would have thought this was possible.
The newly elected House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., has verbally agreed to change the way leadership distributes power and authority in Congress.
Before, many key deals would be pre-negotiated between House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and passed with the support of fewer than half of the Republicans.
Speaker Ryan has promised to put an end to this top-down approach.
Ryan has said there will be no more backroom deals and late-night votes on 1,000-plus page bills members haven’t even read. He has promised that bills that we vote on will have gone through the committee pipeline for weeks — rather than hours — and that members will have had ample opportunity to voice their opinion and offer amendments.
“When we do not follow regular order — when we rush to pass bills a lot of us do not understand — we are not doing our job,” said Ryan.
The speaker also promised to end retribution against Republicans when they vote in line with their constituents. That means there should be no more talk of people getting kicked off their committees or losing their leadership positions for voting their conscience.
The House Freedom Caucus is largely responsible for bringing these issues to the attention of the American people. We did this because we must speak for the American people who feel their government no longer represents them.
This is not presumptuous; this is our duty.
This was never about a personality or an ideology; it was about the process. Personalities come and go, but processes remain. I have always made my decisions based on principles, and by putting the right processes in place, members who vote on principle can truly represent the will of their constituents.
This is also how I approached my vote for speaker: by listening to my constituents and to my conscience.
The hundreds of constituents who flooded my office with calls were overwhelmingly in favor of a fresh new face. As candidates entered the speaker race, I sent each one a list of commitments based on the issues that my constituents are concerned about.
I asked each of the candidates whether they’d commit to the principles on paper. It was important to my constituents that the new leader be willing to be held accountable for promises made.
This list included a number of modest proposals like balancing the budget within 10 years, enforcing the rule of law, promoting fiscal responsibility, and allowing for full debate of legislation on the House floor.
The commitments are not demands, but an opportunity for the candidates to put down on paper their approach to leadership. The list was modeled in part on the “Contract with America” by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich — who called my list “very good” and “well worth looking at.”
Rep. Daniel Webster, R-Fla., responded most favorably to these principles, and even though he has a less conservative voting record…