Liberalizing Crude Oil Exports Should be a Given, Not Washington Horse Trading

Editor:  Of course none of these things are in pursuance of the Constitution.  Energy is one of MANY areas of federal overreach.  All should be repealed and the free market left to work it’s incredible magic.   Federal manipulations of the market cost our tax payers money and jobs as a result of our so called representatives making special deals for who knows what considerations, other than we the people of course.

The United States is awash in crude oil and technology, which is allowing the oil industry to find more oil at less expense. Allowing exports of this oil would yield economic and national security benefits and remove an outdated barrier to the free market, helping to advance the cause of liberty in the U.S.

According to media reports, however, champions for lifting the crude export ban seem to be in a negotiating mood. In exchange for lifting the ill-fitting 1970s ban, some in Congress are considering a list of terrible energy policies to include in the $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill or the tax extenders package.

Such trades are completely unnecessary and counterproductive. The oil export ban will likely be lifted regardless because the benefits of reform are something both Republicans and Democrats can agree on.

The U.S. is now the world’s largest oil producer, thanks to innovation in drilling techniques. U.S. oil production has skyrocketed from some 5 million barrels of oil per day in 2006 to over 9 million barrels per day at present. Much of this oil remains pent up without access to international markets. Lifting the export ban would allow U.S. companies to better compete with the likes of Saudi Arabia and other oil producing nations which have flooded the market and pushed oil prices to historic lows. According to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) review, gas prices could fall 1.3 cents per gallon to as much as 13 cents per gallon. That’s money American businesses and families can spend or save elsewhere. Likewise, the economic ripple effect could be massive, creating some 300,000 jobs and $38 billion in gross domestic product by 2020, according to ICF International. Liberalizing U.S. oil markets would put decisions in the hands of more flexible and responsive marketplaces rather than in those of Washington officials, opening up the opportunity not only for new markets but also for innovation and competition that ultimately benefits U.S. consumers. Enabling U.S. companies to compete in the international marketplace dilutes the ability of countries like Russia to leverage energy markets to bully smaller nations and create political pressure.

Make no mistake: lifting the ban is the right thing to do. But no one in Congress should trade one good policy—eliminating the oil export ban—for concessions that sign Americans up for decades of bad energy policy. On the list of energy policies being considered as “fair trades” are measures to:

Reintroduce the wind and renewable energy production tax credit, which expired last year but is still diverting $16.6 billion tax dollars over the next few years even if Congress does nothing, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. An extension would cost billions more. Re-extend the solar investment tax credit, which even some in the solar industry believe needs to go and only partially masks the real damageS. tariffs on solar equipment do. Permanently renew and fully fund the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which has lost its original purpose and no longer supports states or…

TennesseeWatchman.com

 if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.
%d bloggers like this: