Editor: Simple Solution… READ AND DEMAND COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTION. If they can’t uphold their oath of office to “SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION” not only should they not be in office they should be impeached. Yes, Congress TOO, Article II SECTION 4: “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” I know there are practical issues such as the fact there is likely no one in the U.S. House or Senate who is not guilty. But that should make you even more angry. It does me.
A former congressman has declared “war” against Barack Obama and his unilateral actions designed to disarm America.
On Thursday, Illinois’ Joe Walsh tweeted: “On Monday, Obama, on his own, to go after guns. It’s war. Defy his executive actions. Time for Civil disobedience.”
On Monday, Obama, on his own, to go after guns. It’s war. Defy his executive actions. Time for Civil disobedience. https://t.co/DasTdwv9EQ
— Joe Walsh (@WalshFreedom) December 31, 2015
Walsh served one term in Congress before being beat by Tammy Duckworth. He now hosts a radio show in Chicago.
The Obama Administration is planning an “imminent” announcement of executive orders on gun control, sidestepping Congress and his own legal authority, The Daily Caller is reporting.
A White House spokesman said that the Obama Administration would issue a set of “unilateral actions” at the beginning of this year.
“It is complicated,” spokesman Eric Schultz said. “That’s why it’s taken some time for our policy folks, our lawyers, and our expects to work through this and see what’s possible.”
By “possible,” he means “can defy the Constitution.”
The NRA has said that Obama’s “gun control agenda was rejected by Congress. Now, he is doing what he always does when he doesn’t get his way, defying the will of the people and using executive action.”
Arguing that the current gun laws in California are Obama’s “wish list of gun control” the laws did not “prevent the San Bernardino attack.”
Obama has previously said that gun control was a “matter of national security,” and that only by disarming law-abiding Americans could we effectively combat terrorism.
But of course, even the draconian and unconstitutional laws going into effect in California wouldn’t have stopped the San Bernardino attack.
Liberals know this – the “terrorism” connection is just a cover for their sinister push to confiscate firearms nationwide.
About Robert Gehl
Robert Gehl is a college professor in Phoenix, Arizona. He has over 15 years journalism experience, including two Associated Press awards. He lives in Glendale with his wife and two young children.