Top Stories:

House Conservatives Say New Trouble Brews Over Old Spending Deal

Editor:  Constitutional exercise of the U.S. House over the budget ALONE could restore sanity to our government in a few short years.  Constitutionally there is no need for “budget deals.”  Constitutionally there is no veto authority on budgets (Article 1 Section 7) and the House Alone holds the complete power of the purse.  The Senate MAY offer amendments “as on other bills” but the House is under no obligation to accept them.  This is all a dog and pony show to make it appear to the masses they are doing “the people’s work” when in fact they are feathering their own nests.

 

Federalist 58 Madison

Federalist 58 Madison

BALTIMORE—Republicans retreated to the Baltimore Inner Harbor to talk strategy for their 2016 legislative blitz. But when they return to Washington, they’ll have to settle a skirmish in their own ranks.

The disagreement revolves around the budget deal negotiated in October by President Obama and then-House Speaker John Boehner. That agreement locks in government spending levels for two years, increasing overall spending by $80 billion.

Conservatives want to revisit the issue. Republican leadership does not.

The House Budget Committee led by Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., soon will begin work on a new budget resolution. Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., indicated at the retreat that the committee would use the Boehner-Obama spending levels.

“We had a budget agreement that passed [last year],” McCarthy told reporters Thursday as Republicans gathered at the Baltimore Marriott Waterfront. “I think that’s the number you will see.”

Article 1 Section 7

Article 1 Section 7

By beginning the process three or four weeks earlier than usual, Price said, he hopes to give lawmakers more time to consider each spending bill individually. That’s consistent with a promise by Speaker Paul Ryan, who succeeded Boehner in late October, to return the House to regular order during the appropriations process.

Through regular order—in contrast to the one-and-done omnibus budget package—Congress would approve spending for individual agencies and programs one bill at a time.

Not only will that take time, Rep. Bill Flores of Texas told The Daily Signal at the retreat, it will make renegotiating spending levels incredibly difficult.

“If you want to get the appropriations bills done [one at a time through regular order], the numbers in the October budget deals are the ones that’ll be used,” said Flores, chairman of the conservative-leaning Republican Study Committee.

The House passed the spending levels in October, 266-167, with support from more liberal Republicans and every Democrat in the House except for one. A total of 79 Republicans out of 246 supported the measure.

Two conservatives—Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio—said Wednesday that last year’s deal muddles this year’s legislative waters.

“Maybe we should think about writing that budget to a lower number,” said Jordan, speaking to reporters at The Heritage Foundation, “and do what the American people sent us here to do, which is reduce spending.”

Lee agreed with Jordan, who is chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, noting that the lack of Republican support for the last budget agreement “certainly complicates the task of passing a budget this year.”

Members of the conservative Freedom Caucus say they want guarantees from leadership about how the fast-track reconciliation process would be used before they support any budget resolution.

And while that’s a “tough sell” for leadership to make to conservatives, Flores said, the alternative is also thorny.

If conservatives decided to revisit spending levels, they could hold up the budget process. If that happens, they may lose an opportunity to deploy budget reconciliation—the obscure tactic Republicans used to neutralize a Democrat filibuster and send a bill gutting Obamacare to the president’s desk.

“The question people have…

TennesseeWatchman.com

 if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.

Disclaimer:

Opinions posted on TennesseeWatchman.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of TennesseeWatchman.com or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
%d bloggers like this: