More Top Stories:

Tobacco Giants Eye Lucrative $50 Billion Marijuana Market

Not well known is the fact that in 1970 Philip Morris covertly sought government research funds from the Department of Justice (DOJ), then overseen by Attorney General John N. Mitchell, a close friend and ally of President Richard Nixon. The funds were to be used to study the drug, according to documents obtained under litigation by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).

After approaching DOJ’s Bureau of Narcotics and Drug Abuse with a secret offer to conduct marijuana research, Philip Morris later received formal bureau approval, although the company insisted it be done on a “confidential basis” to avoid public awareness.

We can hardly refuse this request under any circumstances,” stated an unsigned 1970 Philip Morris memo to executives that was obtained by UCSF’s Center for Tobacco Research & Education.

“We are in the business of relaxing people who are tense and providing a pick up for people who are bored or depressed,” the tobacco memo added. “The human needs that our product fills will not go away. Thus, the only real threat to our business is that society will find other means of satisfying these needs.”

Philip Morris, now known as Altria, was so enthusiastic over the prospects of cashing in on marijuana that in 1993 it sought the French trademark and intellectual property rights for the name “Marley,” which was linked to Jamaican celebrity Bob Marley, an avid and well-known advocate for the drug.

Reynolds America’s John McConnico told TheDCNF that there are no marijuana plans underway at his tobacco company. “None of Reynolds American’s operating companies is evaluating entering the U.S. market with commercial brands of marijuana,” he said.

Altria did not respond to TheDCNF’s request for comment.

“I would deny it, too,” replied Keith Humphreys, a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford School of Medicine. “If that were my intention, I would deny it at this moment,” he told TheDCNF.

Humphreys is a giant in the drug abuse and reform movement. He sat on California’s highly publicized “blue ribbon” marijuana policy commission as a steering committee member that was headed by California’s pro-legalization Democratic Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom. Humphreys was also a senior advisor to Obama at the White House Office of Drug Control Policy.

Humphreys said Big Tobacco has a distinct advantage in marijuana production. “On marijuana, who knows better how to grow a plant that you dry up, wrap up in paper and smoke,” he told TheDCNF. “They’re the masters of that worldwide and have wide brand recognition.”

Jonathan Caulkins, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University’s Heinz Center and co-director of RAND’s Drug Policy Center, told TheDCNF he believes the tobacco industry is privately looking at the legalization movement.

“If you’re specifically in the tobacco industry, of course you should be paying great attention,” Caulkins said. “It would be unfair to your shareholders if you didn’t at least watch with interest and probably should have several analysts working full time trying to think of different scenarios of how this could play out,” he said.

“They certainly would deny it if you asked them, but the reality is that tobacco firms are very well positioned,” Dr. Stanton Glantz of the UCSF School of Medicine and the American Legacy Foundation Distinguished Professor of Tobacco Control told TheDCNF.

“They know how to make the product very well and very efficiently, “Glantz said. “More important, they know how to engineer the product to maximize the addictive potential, which is something that the current marijuana enterprises probably aren’t as good at,” he said.

Glantz, who was also a key figure in the litigation effort that released 80 million pages of internal tobacco industry documents, said “it would be a very, very very small step for them to dive into the marijuana with both feet if they wanted to.”

The documents show Big Tobacco has toyed with marijuana cigarettes for at least a half a century.

“Since at least 1970, despite fervent denials, three multinational tobacco companies, Phillip Morris (PM), British American Tobacco (BAT, including its US subsidiary Brown & Williamson [B&W]), and RJ Reynolds (RJR), all have considered manufacturing cigarettes containing cannabis,” the UCSF researchers concluded.

Glantz asserted tobacco companies “have the financial resources, product design technology to optimize puff-by-puff delivery of a psychoactive drug (nicotine), marketing muscle, and political clout to transform the marijuana market.”

As noted previously, big tobacco also is buying up American e-cigarette companies with a fervor. The devices called vaporizers can be used with either tobacco or marijuana.

In the last three years, Altria Group acquired e-cigarette company Green Smoke for $110 million and Lorillard acquired Blu Ecigs for $135 million and Reynolds America launched its own e-cigarette vaporizing brand, called Vuse.

Last April, Japan American Tobacco agreed to acquire Logic Technology Development, LLC, the third largest e-cigarette company offered in American convenience stores.

“For e-cigarettes, there is a huge crossover in e-cigarette use between marijuana and tobacco,” Glantz told TheDCNF.

A 2003 University of Florida study found that two out of three marijuana users follow the drug with mentholated cigarettes, which can extend the high.

Caulkins said he believes “it will be quite possible in the marijuana legalization market, we might move away from combustion-related products and moving heavily into ‘vaping’ based products.”

Follow Richard on Twitter

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

Quantcast

TennesseeWatchman.com

 if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.

Disclaimer:

Opinions posted on TennesseeWatchman.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of TennesseeWatchman.com or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
%d bloggers like this: