More Top Stories:

Armchair Quarterbacks Forget the Realities of Post-9/11 America and the Threat of WMDs

Imagine being President George W. Bush in the early years of his presidency. Imagine that the world suddenly changed in the infancy of your presidency and we discovered that the United States was woefully unprepared for the terrorist threats that loomed.

You’re the son of a former president who was also a previous vice-president and who was also the former head of the CIA. You’ve seen first-hand the kind of leadership required to make tough, decisive action. You know how scary the world can be.

You are constantly receiving reports from your intelligence experts- the most-sophisticated and all-around best intelligence-gathering apparatus in the entire world- and these intelligence reports consistently state that Iraq, the menacing, unstable, despotic nation with whom we were previously at war, possesses weapons of mass destruction.

These reports indicate that this rogue nation can destroy hundreds-of-thousands or even millions of lives or could give these weapons to terrorists to use here at home. If you ignore these reports, millions could die and you would be blamed. If you act upon these reports and they prove to be false, you will be blamed.

Meanwhile, armchair quarterbacks all around the globe get to second-guess whatever decision you make.

The fact that Donald Trump has embraced a political jihad against George W. Bush for his decision concerning Iraq is telling of what, exactly, The Donald would do as president. In the aforementioned scenario, what would any rational world leader do? Sit-on the deluge of intelligence reports all saying the same thing? Cross his fingers and hope that Saddam Hussein won’t gas his own people (again)? That he won’t furnish the weapons to terrorists while we remain vulnerable and work to strengthen our national security efforts?

There is a great, great many things for which one can and should criticize George W. Bush. His bailouts, his unwillingness to do anything meaningful to quell illegal immigration- hell, I will even freely admit that his handling of Iraq post-invasion was abysmal. Our war lingered-on far longer than was necessary as political considerations overtook the objective of getting the job done and then leaving.

Where every conservative ought to defend George W. Bush, however, is in his decision to act-upon the intelligence we had available.

The same security agencies that kept America safe throughout the Cold War, the same intelligence agencies that could tell Reagan what Gorbachev had for breakfast that morning, were the same intelligence agencies that repeatedly assessed that Iraq had WMDs and were prepared to use them.

Alas, none were found.

The same kind of lunatic liberal thinking that causes much of the left to criticize Bush’s actions in this matter is the same kind of warped thinking that believes a police officer can never be allowed to make a mistake.

Tamir Rice was a boy who was shot and killed by police after he brandished a realistic-looking Airsoft gun and reached for it when confronted by police. It was a tragedy.

But without the orange tip…

 if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.


Opinions posted on are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
%d bloggers like this: