More Top Stories:

“WILDERNESS” Designations Have Negative Impact On Local Economies

For God-fearing, Liberty-Loving Patriots

“WILDERNESS” Designations Have Negative Impact On Local Economies

“WILDERNESS” Designations Have Negative Impact
On Local Economies

*Editor’s note: Federal Land designations are currently a hot topic throughout the country, primarily in the west. Due to the importance of the issue, we are reprinting this article from a few years back. The information is just as relevant today as it was then.

By Dave Halsey, NOHVCC

(Snowest) – Of all federal land-use designations, “Wilderness” is the most restrictive. It prohibits roads, road construction, motorized travel, mechanized equipment, logging, mining, telecommunication towers, transmission lines and energy pipelines. Environmentalists often claim that “Wilderness” attracts tourism and boosts local economies. According to a recent study by Utah State University, very often the opposite is true.

“The argument often stated by the environmental community that Wilderness is good for local economies is simply not supported by the data,” states the summary of “The Economic Costs of Wilderness.” Released in 2011, the study was written by Brian Steed, Ryan Yonk and Randy Simmons, of the JohnM. Huntsman School of Business at Utah State. 

Conclusions from the study–and useful talking points for OHV advocates to bring to meetings that involve the Wilderness designation–are important to note:

  • When comparing Wilderness and non-Wilderness counties, Wilderness counties are at an economic disadvantage to their non-Wilderness counterparts. Accordingly, if the test for whether or not to designate Wilderness is economic, Wilderness fails.
  • Economics did not underlie the Wilderness Act or any of the Wilderness Areas established since the Act was passed (1964). Wilderness is established for emotional, ecological and cultural purposes. Results show that those purposes are accomplished at a cost to local economies.
  • Controlling for other factors influencing county economic conditions, the Wilderness designation is significantly associated with lower per capita income, lower total payroll and lower total tax receipts in counties.
  • Despite these differing views, Congress has continued creating Wilderness Areas. There are 759 Wilderness Areas currently in the United States, totaling 109,663,992 acres.
  • Wilderness is managed by four federal agencies: the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. National Park Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Land Management.
  • Only six states contain no Wilderness: Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland and Rhode Island.

The Economic Costs of Wilderness” will make an excellent addition to the NOHVCC on-line library, which contains many studies showing the positive impact OHV recreation has on state and local economies.



Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here:

The post “WILDERNESS” Designations Have Negative Impact On Local Economies appeared first on Redoubt News.

Redoubt News – For Patriots |

Click to Source

“WILDERNESS” Designations Have Negative Impact On Local Economies

“WILDERNESS” Designations Have Negative Impact On Local Economies

Powered by WPeMatico

 if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.


Opinions posted on are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
%d bloggers like this: