More Top Stories:

On Liberal Numerology

Recently President Donald Trump tweeted that special prosecutor Robert Mueller had “17 Angry Democrats” pushing the Russia investigation. You might think that Trump wrote that because he believes there are 17 Democrats on Mueller’s team. But CNN’s Chris Cuomo blew the case wide open Wednesday, revealing that it was actually a secret coded message meant to encourage a 4chan conspiracy.

Here’s the background: At a recent Trump rally, several members of the audience held signs and wore shirts indicated they believed in QAnon, a conspiracy theory so convoluted and stupid I won’t even bother rehashing it. But Cuomo opened his show by arguing that the tweet was intended to send a signal of support to QAnon, an accusation he later blasted out in appropriately hysterical all-caps.

“He has people at his rally that look for the number 17 as signs of truth. Q is the 17th letter in the alphabet,” Cuomo said while displaying Trump’s tweet. “And they see Trump tweeting something like this, ’17 Angry Democrats,’ they take value in the number 17.”

At first Cuomo insisted that he wasn’t accusing Trump of anything. “I hope he didn’t use that number for them. He hasn’t always used the number 17. I don’t see that as being intentional, but who knows these days,” he said.

The “just asking questions” act was of course a load of malarky: if Cuomo didn’t actually think Trump’s tweet was a dog whistle, he wouldn’t have called attention to it on live television after asking his staff to prepare a graphic highlighting the offending sentence. But then Cuomo just sort of gave the game away later in the hour. “Why did the president change from ’13 Angry Democrats’ to 17?” he asked CNN’s Don Lemon before answering, “17 is the Q Anon number. Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet.”

It is true that Q Anon takes specific interest in any mention of “17” from the White House, even claiming it was a secret signal when the Alabama Crimson Tide football team gave Trump a jersey with the number 17 on it (even though, you know, they were the 2017 national champions). But there’s actually a more believable explanation for why Trump started talking about “17 Angry Democrats.”

When Trump first began attacking Mueller’s so-called “13 Angry Democrats” in March, the Washington Post noted that “publicly available voter registration information shows that 13 of the 17 members of Mueller’s team have previously registered as Democrats, while four had no affiliation or their affiliation could not be found.”

In June, Mueller added four new assistant U.S. attorneys to the Russia case, which pro-Trump sites like Gateway Pundit covered with headlines like “CORRUPT MUELLER ADDS FOUR MORE DEEP STATE LIBS TO HIS TEAM.” One of the new attorneys, Jonathan Kravis, worked in the White House Counsel office during the Obama administration.

A month later, when Trump tweeted his usual line about “13 Angry Democrats,” he also noted that “4 more have been added” and alluded to Kravis.

A week after that he first tweeted out that “17… Angry Democrats,” were out for him, noting explicitly that it was “increased from 13.”

So by the time Trump was tweeting simply that “17 Angry Democrats” were on Mueller’s team, he had already laid out an explanation of how he arrived at that number. It’s a characteristically tenuous claim on Trump’s part to be sure; there’s no evidence that all four of the new attorneys were actually Democrats. But it rather obviously had nothing to do with an obscure 4chan conspiracy theory.

Cuomo is unfortunately part of a tend, a sort of new liberal numerology taking conservative and pro-Trump statements and assigning meaning to the appearance of certain numbers. It comes with all the lack of scientific rigor that actual numerology does. When someone writes or speaks about public policy for a living, it’s a matter of statistical certainty that eventually they’ll use a number as common as 17 and you can attack them for pandering to crazies.

To date, liberal numerology has mostly focused on 14 and 88. Both are unquestionably used by Nazis as signifiers, references to “The Fourteen Words” (“We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children”) and “Heil Hitler” (H is the eighth letter of the alphabet). But they’re also, you know, numbers, used by ordinary people every day in ordinary contexts. But Liberal Numerology allows us to go beyond the obvious and easy explanation and see the mystic, ethereal meaning: that person I don’t like is a Nazi.

Fox News pundit Tomi Lahren, for example, was accused of being a secret Nazi for crossing her arms and writing “88” on them.

…Even though Lahren explicitly said she was doing it in tribute to former Dallas Cowboys wide receiver Dez Bryant, whose number was 88 and who often crossed his arms in the same way to celebrate a touchdown.

GLENDALE, AZ – SEPTEMBER 25: Wide receiver Dez Bryant #88 of the Dallas Cowboys reacts after scoring on a 15 yard touchdown pass during the third quarter of the NFL game against the Arizona Cardinals at the University of Phoenix Stadium on September 25, 2017 in Glendale, Arizona. (Photo by Jennifer Stewart/Getty Images)

Then there was the time liberals accused Sarah Palin of using a Nazi dog whistle for tweeting about “14 Words” that Trump used during a tour of Europe.

But the website Palin linked to, YoungCons, frequently uses clickbaity “X Person Used Y Words” headlines to drive traffic by making people curious about what exactly the words are. In 2016, for example, they likewise tweeted that “Obama Gives Final Speech on Terrorism, Says 14 Words That Leave America Speechless.” Trump just happened to also say something that had fourteen words in it.

Outlets like the Daily Beast had to change their headlines from “Here’s Why Sarah Palin Tweeted A Neo-Nazi Slogan” to “Did Sarah Palin Really Tweet a Neo-Nazi Slogan? Seems Not.” But hey, other than that, the story was accurate.

Then there was that time Ann Coulter tweeted out “14!” which liberals took as an outright admission of Nazism.

…Even though Coulter tweeted it 14 days before Obama left office, had been counting down the days until that date for over a year, and generally makes no attempt to keep secret her, ahem, opinions.

The most recent and most embarrassing instance was when multiple journalists from prestigious outlets spread a conspiracy theory claiming that the Department of Homeland Security put out a secret Nazi press release. The evidence this time around was staggering: the headline had 14 words and began with “We must secure,” there were 14 bulleted points, and at one point the number 88 showed up! It was basically Mein Kampf.

Except there was really 13 bullet points. Voss got to 14 by taking a non-bullet pointed section of the press release and including it with the others. And the press release said “we must secure our border” because that’s a really common phrase at DHS, the agency charged with securing our border. The headline was fourteen words, given that some sentences turn out to have fourteen words in them.

The number 88 did appear in the document. So did the numbers 1,100, 7, 50, 2,500, 300, 600, 73, 15,700, 53,908, 94, 23,573, 43, 47, 25,965, 53,908, 95, 3.8, 1,700, 3, 1,750, 313,214, 5, 9, 28, 290,000, 30, 17 and 675,000. In a document packed with statistics, the number 88 can be expected to occasionally pop up purely by chance.

…Wait a minute, what was the paragraph with 88?

ENHANCE.

Scroll up. Enhance.

My god.

Read From Source… [Washington Free Beacon]

TennesseeWatchman.com

 if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.

Disclaimer:

Opinions posted on TennesseeWatchman.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of TennesseeWatchman.com or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
%d bloggers like this: